Hi

We're on S/4 HANA 1511.

When we're trying to migrate data from Legacy system to Simple Finance, we're getting the following error:

We've create the logical system XXXX but not sure how to map it to a Business system. Any help would be really appreciated.

Thanks,

Jay

Hi All,

Can you provide me an insight on what all the FIORI apps available for sFIN in S/4 HANA??

Thanks for your help In Advance.

Regards,

Charles

Hi,

While exploring reports in Simple Finance, tried to create a Report Painter Report using Totals table 'ACDOCT'. However unlike GLT0, FAGLFLEXT or Special Purpose Ledger Summary table, this is not a transparent table but a DDL SQL View. As the library has the table ACDOCT already listed, I tested the functionality by creating a report group and report. For Leading Ledger 0L the data seems to work well and the summarized values are very much in sync with ACDOCA (Universal Journal Line items) table. However for other Standard or Appendix Ledger the values in these two tables are not matching. Also the report only displays values for 0L ledger and not for the rest. I could not locate any document on the specific usage of ACDOCT table. The limitations of DDL SQL View is available when we go to SE11 and query this table.

Apart for Report Painter library, table ACDOCT also finds a place in another node. Refer to navigation below. Hence we can presume there is certainly some amount of utility for this summary table.

Navigation Path: Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Ledgers > Fields > Customer Fields > Master data check.

As the report painter seems to work pretty well for 0L ledger, guess, we can create  some useful reports very quickly. To reap the benefits of extracts form this table, would appreciate if any one who has also tried this functionality could share their knowledge.

Thanks,

Swami

Hi,

We have observed that the length for currency fields (FI/CO/MM/SD or any other module) is 23 in universal Journal ACDOCA .The examples are KSL,VSL,HSL,TSL,OSL,CO_OSL etc.

However,BSEG has a limit of 13 digits with 2 decimal places for currencies (DMBTR,WRBTR,KZBTR,PSWBT) which implies that even if ACDOCA has a limit of 23 ,values will be restricted based on the limit set in BSEG table .We have also tested in our system that values for more than 13 digits do not get stored in BSEG and the same value gets stored in ACDOCA.

Can anybody suggest for the limit set for all the currency fields in ACDOCA ? or Is there any scenario where 23 digits in ACDOCA would benefit postings from any module ?

Hi everyone.

We'll implement SAP Simple Finance and Fiori.

Now I'm trying to see report "Cash Position Details" on Fiori.

Problem

  When I use Cash Position Details, an error message is displayed as below. 

  'Unable to read data from Bank Account Currency view'

Situation

  I have already done the basic configurations.(written in following URL)

  https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/012002523100003876582015E/SFIN_MIG_CASH.pdf

  https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/012002523100004942962015E/SFIN_CLM_CONFIG_GUIDE.pdf

What I wanna know

  1) Has anyone had the same error message ? How had you corresponded ?

  2) What data table is retrieved when Cash Position Detail executed ?

Best regards,

TM

Hi All,

We have installed Simple Finance 2.0 in our system. I have configured New Asset Accounting and posted transactions related to acquisition and depreciation.

SAP mentions that there are 5 asset  tables ANEA, ANEP, ANEK,ANLC and ANLP which will not get updated post SFIN 2.0 installation on posting of asset transactions.

Views for these 3 tables are  FAAV_ANEA,FAAV_ANEP, FAAV_ANEK,FAAV_ANLC,FAAV_ANLP and SAP has mentioned that data related to asset transactions will be available in these view tables instead of the original asset tables.

However, I have noticed that out of these 5 tables, 3 tables ANEK, ANLC and ANLP are still getting updated and the number of records in these 3 asset tables and the corresponding view tables are same.I believe this is incorrect as there should not be any data in these 3 asset tables .

This is working fine for tables ANEA and ANEP where data does not exist in the tables but can be viewed through corresponding view tables FAAV_ANEA and FAAV_ANEP.

ACDOCA gets updated with all the required data and updation of data in these 3 tables is duplication of records.

Have I missed out any configuration ? Any suggestion ? Is there any document available which gives information about updation of data in these tables ?

Hi,

i don't know if this is the right place for this question, but here goes:

we have a SAP ECC 6.07 on netweaver 7.4 system that runs on HANA.(So this is Business Suite power by HANA)

The customer wants the system be upgraded / updated to S/4HANA Simple Finance on the latest level ,but without Simple Logistics because of a current configuration with SRM.

As far as I see it , it is not possible to go to S/4HANA SFin 1503 SP03 (1511) without Simple Logistics , but it is not clear if this is really the case.

I read through several notes, guides and faqs but what I assume now is that simple logistics (it isn't called that anymore according to some notes) is part of S/4HANA Core and / or Enterprise Management. And with that when you implement Simple Finance you get Simple Logistics with it in version 1511.

But.... I don't know if that is correct.

So the options I see now for our system is the following:

Implement 1503- SP02 (1508) , which stays on netweaver 7.4.
You don't have Slog and you can implement Simple Finance 1503.

On the downside : We don't have the latest version , we don't have the 1511 apps (HANA and Fiori) which the customer wants to have.

Implement 1503 - SP03 (1511) , which needs netweaver 7.5.
You can implement the latest Sfin 1503(1511) version ,BUT you also get Slog ... So you have the latest version and the latest 1511 apps, but you also have Slog which makes the SRM config unworkable.

Both are not what the customer demands.

Can someone point us in the right direction on this matter.

(We already asked our national SAP office,but they can't seem to give us a clear answer.... so far as simple goes..)

thanks!

Hi,

Does anyone know why house bank maintenance was separated from house bank account. The only reason i could think of is to encourage all to use NWBC and new user interfaces provided by SAP etc. Anyway, it is strange that we cannot do it under SAP GUI system but only in NWBC.

Also, i have strange situation that having all needed roles to BAM and BAM lite i cannot operate by starting WDY_APPLICATION - Manage Bank accounts directly but i need to always start SAP Business Client 6.0 and go to BAM from there. If i start WDY_APPLICATION - Manage Bank accounts from SAP Easy Access menu it is opened and i see all house banks etc. but when i choose 'New bank account' nothing is happening. If i do the same from SAP NWBC then new page is opened to create bank account ... is there some SICF service still not activated ?

Thanks for all the tips.

Tomasz

Dear All,

We have installed sFIN 2.0 in our company and are trying to access the IBP for Finance thru web URL. And, it is not successful. We do not even know which URL is used to access the IBP web.

Earlier, we had installed BPC 10.1 stand alone version in a separate box and there, we did not have this issue and we were able to access the BPC web thru URL.

I believe IBP for Finance is part of sFIN. I am not sure if I need to install BPC 10.1 separately! Or, Is BPC 10.1 is part of sFIN installation? Do I need to activate BPC 10.1 to use the BPC/IBP web thru URL?

Any help to resolve this would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you.

Regards,

Peri

Hello,

While assigning chart of depreciation to company code I am facing following issue.

Parallel crcy area (crcy type 30) missing for area 01 ch. of deprec. SFIN

Message No. ACC_AA116

Diagnosis

For the leading valuation of the ledger approach and accounts approach and for parallel valuations of the ledger approach, the following is valid: The parallel currencies in the leading ledger in General Ledger Accounting and in the depreciation areas in Asset Accounting must be the same.

Procedure

If you have previously been using parallel currencies in General Ledger Accounting but you have not implemented the corresponding parallel currency areas in Asset Accounting for all depreciation areas, you must first implement these depreciation areas before you can install SAP Smart Financials. Contact your system specialist.

Regards

Kishor

Dear All,

I am a BPC 10.0 Consultant. Recently, BPC tool is going thru lots of changes - from 10.0 to 10.1 and then to IBP for Finance(Embedded BPC???). On the other hand, there is a separate version of IBP for SCM(Supply Chain Management - S & OP ).

Would like to know if SAP is going to maintain separate IBP version for Finance and SCM.

If so, what is the latest version of IBP for Finance and SCM?

Are there separate version of IBP for Finance - one for S/4 HANA and the other for non-HANA environment?

Is there any certification program for IBP on the Finance side?

Thanks in advance for the clarification.

Regards,
Peri

Hello everybody, I recently have installed an SAP S/4 HANA Core Server for demo and training purposes, I realized that SWPM gives me the option to install an S/4 HANA FrontEnd Server, my question is

Is necessary to have both systems installed to work properly? I know that S/4 has a new UI and so on, but I'm not sure (and is not clear for me) if this new appearence should be installed in another server (S/4 Frontend server?)

Which are your recommendations? Which is the ideal landscape?

I hope you can help me

thanks in advance

Hi All,

SFIN2 is installed in our system. While doing Configuration of Ledger & Additional currency, we found that

When we add 2nd or 3rd currency type as Controlling area currency -> we get error as Local currency cant be defined completely for company code

And when we don't have any currency type = Controlling area currency -> we can post the document to company code.

One of the reason is in T code OB22 - currency code is not being updated for currency type =20. Even though it is updated in Controlling area configuration.

When you check T code OB22 - It gives message as use t code FINSC_LEDGER - to maintain currency setting & when you still continue you cant edit but can check additional currency for company code.

I believe Currency code details are supposed to be updated form config of t code FINSC_LEDGER or OKKP, but it is not happening.

Am I missing any other config?

We did below configuration

1) Controlling area created & currency assigned = 20  & Currency code = EUR. this currency is populated in Ledger configuration as group & controlling currency

2) In Ledger setting, we have three currency

     i. Local Currency =10 company code currency (Derivied from Comapny code)

     ii. Global Currency for GL & Controlling = 20 controlling area currency ( Derived from Controlling area)

     iii.1st Additional currency =30 or 60 (This has to be defined in this t code)

Please suggest, If we miss anything to configure?

P.S:-  We Ran program "FINS_CUST_CONS_CHK" to check currency & ledger consistence. And we got Green message "Check Passed"

Hi,

i don't know if this is the right place for this question, but here goes:

we have a SAP ECC 6.07 on netweaver 7.4 system that runs on HANA.(So this is Business Suite power by HANA)

The customer wants the system be upgraded / updated to S/4HANA Simple Finance on the latest level ,but without Simple Logistics because of a current configuration with SRM.

As far as I see it , it is not possible to go to S/4HANA SFin 1503 SP03 (1511) without Simple Logistics , but it is not clear if this is really the case.

I read through several notes, guides and faqs but what I assume now is that simple logistics (it isn't called that anymore according to some notes) is part of S/4HANA Core and / or Enterprise Management. And with that when you implement Simple Finance you get Simple Logistics with it in version 1511.

But.... I don't know if that is correct.

So the options I see now for our system is the following:

Implement 1503- SP02 (1508) , which stays on netweaver 7.4.
You don't have Slog and you can implement Simple Finance 1503.

On the downside : We don't have the latest version , we don't have the 1511 apps (HANA and Fiori) which the customer wants to have.

Implement 1503 - SP03 (1511) , which needs netweaver 7.5.
You can implement the latest Sfin 1503(1511) version ,BUT you also get Slog ... So you have the latest version and the latest 1511 apps, but you also have Slog which makes the SRM config unworkable.

Both are not what the customer demands.

Can someone point us in the right direction on this matter.

(We already asked our national SAP office,but they can't seem to give us a clear answer.... so far as simple goes..)

thanks!

Hi John ,

Thanks for info. Now I am able to start open and Account how ever. I am facing new issue where relating Work Flow even I am using predefined standard Template and Rules (Bank Accountant/Cash Manager/Key User are agents). Given below the details issue is not moving from Bank Accountant to Cash Manger and further the work items.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

We are in the process of setting up workflow in Suite on HANA / Simple Finance and the workflow is not progressing after the step.

Please find the details of issue:

ISSUE: Bank Master Data creation having standard WF process there are three agents namely; BANK ACCOUNTANT /CASH MANAGER/KEY USER.

Step -1 Bank Accountant initiate Bank Master record Creation and triggers to Cash Manager for review and approve

Step-2 Cash Manager review from his Work item and review and approve/reject and same will be notify to Bank Accountant for next process.

( we are now getting struck in this stage, as per the standard workflow, sub workflow WS74300047 needs to be triggered but it is not happening as it is not able to determine the agents based on rule resolution 74300006 here)

Step-3   Bank Accountant collect few information from bank say Bank account number and IBAN and save and submit. This next trigger to key user for further process.

Step-4   Key User will be process Work Item updating GL Master/Signatories etc., to particular Bank Master and  Save and Activate which will close Work item.

Above we are using Standard Work template WS74300043 and Rules mentioned below

SAP predefines a Business Object Repository (BOR) object FCLM_CR for Bank Account Management. In this object, the workflow is being triggered with “CREATED” event below

The Rules defined / used:

74300006 FCLM_CASHMGR (2nd step)

74300007 FCLM_CASHOPER (1st and 3rd steps)

74300008 FCLM_CASHSYSCOLL

Request to you review and answer the solution if any has faced the same issue.

Raghuchandran.R

Hi, When i try to make a changue or see a bank account request, the next error appears:

"Error in opening change request 0000000000; contact system administrator".

When i created the bank account request, everything was fine, the system showed me the numer of changue request new and it was different than 0000000000.

Hi,

We are setting up Central Finance, I would like to understand the required configuration to be performed with respect to key mapping and Value mapping in MDG which will be used in central finance.

With respect to central finance, we are transferring data from our source system company code to Target system company code. In which our source system is also SAP. Now we would like replicate our source system data to Central Finance system (Target System) for this we need to perform key mapping / value mapping between source system data and target system.

Need help in this regard to understand the required settings to be performed for key mapping and value mapping without any custom enhancements to post source system data to central finance system.

Regards,

Kiran Kumar. A

Hi Team,

The Revenue Evaluation report is configured with Right Evaluation Parameters as per the client requirement.

The COPA report KE24 shows data for this selction

But still the revenue evaluation Report does not show data

Any idea what is missing for the Report to show data.

Regards,

Pinee

Hello everybody, I recently have installed an SAP S/4 HANA Core Server for demo and training purposes, I realized that SWPM gives me the option to install an S/4 HANA FrontEnd Server, my question is

Is necessary to have both systems installed to work properly? I know that S/4 has a new UI and so on, but I'm not sure (and is not clear for me) if this new appearence should be installed in another server (S/4 Frontend server?)

Which are your recommendations? Which is the ideal landscape?

I hope you can help me

thanks in advance

Hi,

i don't know if this is the right place for this question, but here goes:

we have a SAP ECC 6.07 on netweaver 7.4 system that runs on HANA.(So this is Business Suite power by HANA)

The customer wants the system be upgraded / updated to S/4HANA Simple Finance on the latest level ,but without Simple Logistics because of a current configuration with SRM.

As far as I see it , it is not possible to go to S/4HANA SFin 1503 SP03 (1511) without Simple Logistics , but it is not clear if this is really the case.

I read through several notes, guides and faqs but what I assume now is that simple logistics (it isn't called that anymore according to some notes) is part of S/4HANA Core and / or Enterprise Management. And with that when you implement Simple Finance you get Simple Logistics with it in version 1511.

But.... I don't know if that is correct.

So the options I see now for our system is the following:

Implement 1503- SP02 (1508) , which stays on netweaver 7.4.
You don't have Slog and you can implement Simple Finance 1503.

On the downside : We don't have the latest version , we don't have the 1511 apps (HANA and Fiori) which the customer wants to have.

Implement 1503 - SP03 (1511) , which needs netweaver 7.5.
You can implement the latest Sfin 1503(1511) version ,BUT you also get Slog ... So you have the latest version and the latest 1511 apps, but you also have Slog which makes the SRM config unworkable.

Both are not what the customer demands.

Can someone point us in the right direction on this matter.

(We already asked our national SAP office,but they can't seem to give us a clear answer.... so far as simple goes..)

thanks!